Project Management Methodology for a Modern Business
The typical approach to project management methodology is the most common course of action that has worked in the past. But with the ever changing market and changing structure of business, this is not always the best course of action to take.
The advantage of using a methodology that has been used in the past is that the strengths and weaknesses of that path are already known. With this knowledge, it is helpful but not necessarily the beat project management methodology to follow or use in this new age.
Many of the old business practices are based on results before the internet became a large part of commerce around the world. The different parts of managing a project, along with the tools a project manager will be using, is new and a company’s project management methodology must be updated to reflect this.
The same parts are there like initiation, planning, execution, monitoring, and closure of a project, but the way it is followed and tracked is totally different. The use of project management templates has moved the supervision of a project by its manager into the digital age.
The PRINCE2 approach to project management methodology is a combination of PROMP methodology and the IBM’s MITP methodology. This system was released in 1996 in a generic form to meet the needs of the business world at that time.
Many modern version of project management methodology use the PRINCE2 as a base structure for their software programs. The method itself is flexible enough to control when part of the process deviates from the set course of the plan. The key components of the input and outputs are closely monitored so the specific goals of the project are met with little to no deal.
The largest variable in a project management methodology is the leadership that guides the project to its successful conclusion. A disciplined leader is needed to take on this vast responsibility. Without such leadership, the best laid plans will not be very efficient.
When it comes time to choose your next project management methodology, take the appropriate amount of time to know all the different factors that could affect the outcome with each methodology approach you are considering to use.
The advantage of using a methodology that has been used in the past is that the strengths and weaknesses of that path are already known. With this knowledge, it is helpful but not necessarily the beat project management methodology to follow or use in this new age.
Many of the old business practices are based on results before the internet became a large part of commerce around the world. The different parts of managing a project, along with the tools a project manager will be using, is new and a company’s project management methodology must be updated to reflect this.
The same parts are there like initiation, planning, execution, monitoring, and closure of a project, but the way it is followed and tracked is totally different. The use of project management templates has moved the supervision of a project by its manager into the digital age.
The PRINCE2 approach to project management methodology is a combination of PROMP methodology and the IBM’s MITP methodology. This system was released in 1996 in a generic form to meet the needs of the business world at that time.
Many modern version of project management methodology use the PRINCE2 as a base structure for their software programs. The method itself is flexible enough to control when part of the process deviates from the set course of the plan. The key components of the input and outputs are closely monitored so the specific goals of the project are met with little to no deal.
The largest variable in a project management methodology is the leadership that guides the project to its successful conclusion. A disciplined leader is needed to take on this vast responsibility. Without such leadership, the best laid plans will not be very efficient.
When it comes time to choose your next project management methodology, take the appropriate amount of time to know all the different factors that could affect the outcome with each methodology approach you are considering to use.
Comments
Post a Comment